#STM32 SIMPLE DELAY LICENSE#

What’s in the text?įrom my reading, it contains NONE or what half-researched accusations claim it does. That’s all we have to go on and we can’t be governed by vague whims and changing fashion. Nobody is happy and I’m wasting time and energy over a closed matter.īe sure you read the license. I alienate everybody and everyone thinks I’m a dick. As soon as these half-formulated purity rituals start up, I end up having to deal with 2 or more conversations. To verify the delay accuracy (see main ), you can call STOPWATCHSTART, run stopwatchdelay (ticks), then call STOPWATCHSTOP and. It uses the STM32's DWTCYCCNT register, which is specifically designed to count actual clock ticks, located at address 0圎0001004. I’m in a position of defending something that can only cause me trouble. Use stopwatchdelay (4) below to accomplish approximately 24ns of delay. We can’t lob emotional hand grenades and half-thought-through wording.

You can use guess work and vague innuendo and how you feel something might be interpreted and interpreted by any number of other people out there with little to no stake in the businesses.Īd hominem and insinuation seem to be okay as well. It is overly easy (and cost free) for people to come in and lob disparaging guess-bombs and accusations at will. We don’t follow whims and fashion and I’m absolutely sick to death of this discussion. I’m completely sick of revisiting closed subjects. Your feelings may differ but the words of the agreement are there.

#STM32 SIMPLE DELAY LICENSE#

Wes read the license and complies with it in his business venture. Is 1979 comporting with the words of the license? Yes! That’s all that we, the moderators, can go on. On Emilie’s GitHub, it is stated that Mutable Modules are covered under the MIT license to which you’ve linked. Read what I stupidly wrote to you on Facebook (I should never engage with people in that cesspool). I’m getting VERY tired of this argument and it needs to stop. We could have a timer tick at 80 MHz, but that might be too fast for many of our applications. You do a great job getting these modules to the Buchla format, but I don't get why you don't respect the Creative Commons license. In this demo, we will be using an STM32 Nucleo-L476RG, which has a default main clock (HCLK) of 80 MHz. I am no specialist, but Mutable Instruments hardware is licensed as cc-by-sa-3.0.Īnd it means that 'Adaptations must be shared under the same terms'. Additionally, there is no question of attribution because the original copyright owner (Mutable Instruments) is clearly identified. There is no licensing issue here because no copyrighted material has been published. That would be a failure to give proper attribution. The only way to be non-compliant with the MIT License is to publish copyrighted material without including the license. This allows proper attribution of the original copyright owner. The sole requirement imposed by the MIT License is that if copyrighted material is published, a copy of the license must be included.

Stm32 simple delay